We want to enable students from different backgrounds and disciplines to be able to study architecture. We’ve been doing research and engaging with architects and schools, and we’ve heard that the cost of education and the requirements for work experience create barriers for people from less affluent backgrounds or without existing networks in the profession. ‘The profession needs to better reflect society’īut probably the biggest prize, if we get these reforms right, will be about access to the profession and improving diversity. We’ve heard a consistent message that reform is required if architects of the future are to take on leadership roles in response to the climate crisis, or to help build the necessary safety-focused cultural changes in the built environment sector. The feedback we’ve received from the sector through our research and direct engagement. What has driven this planned reform – and what part of the current system needs the most modernisation? We are proposing fundamental reforms in response to the feedback we’ve received, not to propose change for change’s sake. Is it fair to call this consultation the biggest step so far on the journey towards the most significant shake-up of architectural education since the 1950s?Ībsolutely, although we will be guided by the feedback from the profession and the sector.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |